Especialista em Políticas Públicas e Gestão Governamental
🔐 Abrir TEXTO DE APOIO (material-base da questão)
Policymakers face the challenge of supporting both inclusive and sustainable economic development and a healthy environment. While the most desirable policy outcome is one that achieves the greatest environmental benefits while also advancing socioeconomic goals, it is important for policymakers to fully understand the possible trade-offs between these objectives. A better understanding of the broader impacts of environmental policies is crucial to mitigate their adverse effects on competing goals, especially as countries are faced with the arduous task of responding to mounting environmental challenges in economically turbulent times.
Governments are under pressure to scale up and accelerate their ambition on climate and environmental goals. But in taking such action forward, they have to carefully navigate a number of headwinds. These include the long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on both the economy and society, cost-of-living crisis, political tensions and geopolitical crises such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Low-income people and the poorest economies are the hardest hit, primarily due to the steep increases in the price of energy and food.
The level of environmental policy stringency can have an impact on a variety of policy outcomes. Empirical research is crucial to shed light on these interlinkages. Previous research has shown that more stringent environmental policy has achieved significant environmental benefits with little aggregate effect on economic performance. However, localized effects may generate winners and losers, with significant losses for certain sectors, firms or individuals and benefits for others. Nonetheless, at present, the empirical evidence on these distributional aspects is still scarce, despite its crucial role in supporting good policy design. More than ever, regulators need better tools and insights to assess the consequences of environmental policies on the economy and on social outcomes.
QUESTÃO
“However” in “However, localised effects may generate winners and losers” (3rd paragraph) introduces a(n):
pleasant fact.
sincere praise.
opposing idea.
strong emphasis.
workable strategy.
🔐 Abrir GABARITO
🔐 Abrir QUESTÃO COMENTADA (leitura guiada + pegadinhas)
🧭 Leitura orientada
A questão avalia o valor discursivo do conector “However” no trecho “However, localised effects may generate winners and losers”. O candidato deve identificar a relação lógica que o conector estabelece com a ideia anterior.
🔍 Análise do trecho
No terceiro parágrafo, o texto afirma que políticas ambientais mais rigorosas podem gerar benefícios ambientais com pouco impacto agregado na economia. However introduz, em seguida, uma ressalva: apesar do resultado geral positivo, podem ocorrer efeitos localizados com vencedores e perdedores.
🧠 Núcleo de sentido
O conector “However” funciona como marcador de contraste/oposição, apresentando uma ideia que se contrapõe parcialmente à afirmação anterior, sem anulá-la.
🔍 Análise alternativa por alternativa (com pegadinhas)
(A) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: não há fato agradável; o trecho aponta um possível problema
(perdedores).
(B) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: não se trata de elogio ou apreciação positiva.
(C) ✅ Correta — GABARITO
However introduz uma ideia oposta/contrastiva em relação
ao argumento anterior.
(D) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: o conector não serve para intensificar,
mas para contrapor.
(E) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: não há proposta de estratégia ou solução prática.
🧠 Resumo B3GE™ Master
✔ Questão de conector discursivo.
✔ However = porém / contudo.
✔ Marca oposição parcial ao que foi dito antes.
✔ Função: contraste, não ênfase nem elogio.
🔎 Gabarito confirmado: (C)