🔖 FCC | Inglês | 2025 | Questão 30 Comentada | Prefeitura (São Paulo - SP) | Auditor |🏛️ B3GE™

FCC 2025 | Inglês | Questão 30 Comentada
Prefeitura de São Paulo (SP)  |  Cargo: Auditor Municipal de Controle Interno (AMCI)  |  B3GE™

▶ Navegação rápida

⬛ TEXTO (clique para abrir / fechar)

Para responder às questões de números 29 e 30, considere o texto a seguir.

It's Time for Innovation to Transform Education

It's no secret that the U.S. education system is facing numerous challenges. The standardized, one-size-fits-all approach focuses on memorization and rote learning styles, often failing to cater to the unique needs and talents of individual students. This lack of personalization can lead to disengagement and poor outcomes, leaving students feeling unmotivated and unprepared for life outside of school.

Innovation in education needs funding. But there's a catch: to receive funding, entrepreneurs usually need to show proof of concept — that their idea works.

That can be tricky for education entrepreneurs who want to think outside of the box. In the United States, the trusted old models receive funding from legislators because they use traditional measures and assessments to decide "what works." But it’s exactly those old models and measures that need to be transformed.

Academic achievement among American students continues to fall behind their global counterparts. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, U.S. students rank 28 out of 37 countries in math proficiency and similarly low in reading and science.

The fact is, in the U.S., education from 1st to 12th grade has long been more about tradition than innovation. For generations, our schooling experience has seen little change. Our schools may look the same as our parents’ schools, and their schools looked the same as their parents’ did. Education has focused more on listening to lectures, memorizing facts, and writing essays than on exploring the things that make each student uniquely themselves.

What if education and imagination could be synonymous? That is the vision the VELA Education Fund seeks to advance through its work providing support for a variety of education models for students across the U.S. school system.

This nonprofit has flipped the script — moving away from giving large amounts of money to a select few individuals and instead offering millions of dollars in small grants to thousands of everyday entrepreneurs. This model generates new approaches to education within founders’ communities. These innovators share a self-starting spirit, a desire to meet the needs of learners and families, and a willingness to stretch the boundaries of the “where, how, and when” of school.

VELA’s model is unique because it instills trust and encourages autonomy among educators, based on the belief that those closest to the problem should be designing its solutions. Unlike other grants, VELA doesn’t require extensive proof of concept before investment, allowing funding to drive outcomes — not the other way around. By distributing smaller grants to a larger pool of applicants, VELA is able to support a more diverse range of ideas, experiences, and types of educational institutions. These smaller grants also allow recipients to take more risks and be more creative.

“We limit our potential when we limit the people who have access to opportunities to drive social change,” said Meredith Olson, president of VELA. “A few thousand dollars to the right person can fuel innovation at a scale we never imagined possible.”

So far, VELA has awarded more than $35 million in grants to nearly 2,500 recipients — including microschool founders, homeschool leaders, and many others — who collectively serve more than 5 million students nationwide. The organization’s continued support sends a strong message to other education funders: trust families and educators to know what’s best for their learners, and empower them with opportunities to act on that knowledge.

It cites OECD data: U.S. students rank 28 out of 37 in math proficiency and similarly low in reading and science.

The text then presents VELA Education Fund, which provides many small grants to many entrepreneurs, trusting those closest to the problem and not requiring extensive proof of concept before investment.

🔗 Texto adaptado de: Why we need more innovation in education & VELA Education Fund Catalyzes lnnovation in Education
30

QUESTÃO

Segundo o texto,

A

é destinado a empreendedores com uma visão Inovadora sobre educação.

B

exige que o pretendente apresente documentação comprovando a exequibilidade de seu projeto.

C

comprova que educadores e familiares são os mais indicados para desenvolver o pleno potencial de estudantes do ensino médio.

D

privilegia escolas particulares de grande porte não contempladas por financiamentos públicos.

E

já beneficiou mais de 2.500 educadores de várias áreas.

🔐 Gabarito (clique para revelar)
Gabarito: C

🧭 Leitura orientada

O texto descreve o modelo de financiamento da VELA como inovador por: (i) distribuir muitos pequenos grants para milhares de empreendedores, (ii) não exigir extensa prova de conceito, e (iii) basear-se na crença de que quem está mais perto do problema deve desenhar as soluções.

🔍 Análise alternativa por alternativa (com pegadinhas)


(A) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: alternativa verdadeira, porém ampla demais.
O texto afirma que a VELA apoia uma variedade de modelos e empreendedores “everyday entrepreneurs”, incentivando inovação. Ainda assim, a banca pode ter buscado um recorte mais específico do mecanismo de confiança/autonomia.


(B) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: contradição direta.
O texto diz explicitamente que a VELA não exige extensive proof of concept before investment. Logo, a alternativa vai contra o trecho central.


(C) ✅ Correta (gabarito oficial)
Pegadinha: extrapolação de escopo (nível/etapa escolar).
O texto defende que famílias e educadores devem ser confiados e empoderados (“trust families and educators”), pois estão próximos do problema. Entretanto, ele não restringe isso ao ensino médio nem fala em “comprovar” pleno potencial especificamente nessa etapa. Ainda assim, esta alternativa é marcada como correta por corresponder ao gabarito oficial fornecido.


(D) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: informação inventada.
O texto não privilegia escolas particulares grandes; menciona microschools, homeschool leaders e outros perfis diversos.


(E) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: número e público-alvo distorcidos.
O texto afirma “nearly 2,500 recipients”, não “mais de 2.500”, e esses beneficiados incluem diferentes perfis (fundadores, líderes etc.), não necessariamente “educadores de várias áreas”.


🧠 Resumo B3GE™ Master

Em itens sobre financiamento, as pegadinhas clássicas são: (i) inverter “não exige prova” para “exige”, (ii) trocar “quase” por “mais de”, e (iii) adicionar recortes que o texto não faz (ex.: “ensino médio”). Aqui, o núcleo textual favorece a ideia de confiança em famílias/educadores, mas sem delimitar etapa escolar; ainda assim, mantém-se o ✅ no gabarito oficial (C).